Physics – Geophysics
Scientific paper
2006-08-15
Physical Review Letters 99, 179801 (2007)
Physics
Geophysics
Scientific paper
10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.179801
By analyzing a southern California earthquake catalog, Davidsen and Paczuski [Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 048501 (2005)] claim to have found evidence contradicting the theory of aftershock zone scaling in favor of scale-free statistics. We present four elements showing that Davidsen and Paczuski's results may be insensitive to the existence of physical length scales associated with aftershock zones or mainshock rupture lengths, so that their claim is unsubstantiated. (i) Their exponent smaller than 1 for a pdf implies that the power law statistics they report is at best an intermediate asymptotic; (ii) their power law is not robust to the removal of 6 months of data around Landers earthquake within a period of 17 years; (iii) the same analysis for Japan and northern California shows no evidence of robust power laws; (iv) a statistical model of earthquake triggering that explicitely obeys aftershock zone scaling can reproduce the observed histogram of Davidsen and Paczuski, demonstrating that their statistic may not be sensitive to the presence of characteristic scales associated with earthquake triggering.
Sornette Didier
Werner M. J.
No associations
LandOfFree
Comment on "Analysis of the Spatial Distribution between Successive Earthquakes" by Davidsen and Paczuski does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Comment on "Analysis of the Spatial Distribution between Successive Earthquakes" by Davidsen and Paczuski, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comment on "Analysis of the Spatial Distribution between Successive Earthquakes" by Davidsen and Paczuski will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-220295