Physics
Scientific paper
Apr 1991
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1991georl..18..753t&link_type=abstract
Geophysical Research Letters (ISSN 0094-8276), vol. 18, April 1991, p. 753, 754; Author's Reply, p. 755-758.
Physics
3
Venus, Nightside, Ionosphere, Electrical Field, Whistlers, Radiowaves, Emissions, Solar Effects, Plasma, Spacecraft Observations, Atmosphere, Pvo Mission, Waves, Frequencies, Lighting, Magnetic Field, Analysis, Morphology, Oefd Instrument
Scientific paper
Taylor and Cloutier (TC, 1988) previously argued that Singh and Russell (SR, 1986) wrongly identified telemetry interference as VLF broadband signals originating in Venus 'lightning events'. A response was made by Russell and Singh (RS, 1989). This comment criticizes RS, arguing that the SR did not distinguish between signal and noise and that RS makes false claims about the SR analysis. In a reply to TC, Russell argues that the SR paper, while flawed, was not intended to be quantitative and succeeds in bringing attention to the morphology of the signals seen in the upper three channels of the Pioneer Venus electric field detector.
Cloutier Paul A.
Taylor Harry A.
No associations
LandOfFree
Comment on 'A re-examination of impulsive VLF signals in the night ionosphere of Venus' does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Comment on 'A re-examination of impulsive VLF signals in the night ionosphere of Venus', we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comment on 'A re-examination of impulsive VLF signals in the night ionosphere of Venus' will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1791517