COMMENT: Comparison of the minimal and canonical measures

Details COMMENT: Comparison of the minimal and canonical measures COMMENT: Comparison of the minimal and canonical measures

Jul 1996

adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1996cqgra..13.2029c&link_type=abstract

Classical and Quantum Gravity, Volume 13, Issue 7, pp. 2029-2032 (1996).

Physics

2

Scientific paper

Evrard and Coles, using the argument that we should consider our state of knowledge to be `minimal', suggest the flatness problem in a dust FRW universe is absent. However, the form of their measure is not consistent with the lack of scale invariance in general relativity when masses are present. Once this invariance is removed, the measure is no longer dominated by fixed points (which are of measure zero) but by transitory ones. One can still obtain the result 0264-9381/13/7/026/img1 by a measure that imposes large 0264-9381/13/7/026/img2 one such measure that does this is the canonical measure of Gibbons and coworkers.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

COMMENT: Comparison of the minimal and canonical measures does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with COMMENT: Comparison of the minimal and canonical measures, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and COMMENT: Comparison of the minimal and canonical measures will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1117100