Physics
Scientific paper
Jul 2003
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2003icrc....6.3631b&link_type=abstract
Proceedings of the 28th International Cosmic Ray Conference. July 31-August 7, 2003. Trukuba, Japan. Under the auspices of the I
Physics
2
Scientific paper
We have considered CMEs, halo CMEs and partial halo CMEs and their interplanetary signatures (magnetic clouds, ejecta and shocks). Influences of these structures on cosmic ray intensity have been studied. method of superp osed epoch (Chree) analysis has been employed; key days corresp ond to the arrival of these structures. It is observed that halo CMEs are most effective transient modulators as compared to others. Consideration of interplanetary manifestations of these CMEs shows that the effects of magnetic clouds and ejecta itself, on cosmic ray modulation are small and not significantly different in two cases. However, both the shock-ejecta and shock-cloud combinations are much more effective in transient modulation and any difference in their effectiveness apparently does not depend on the structure (ejecta or magnetic cloud) following the shock.
Badruddin
Pal Singh Yatendra
No associations
LandOfFree
CME Types, Their Interplanetary Manifestations (ICMEs) and Effects on Cosmic Ray Intensity does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with CME Types, Their Interplanetary Manifestations (ICMEs) and Effects on Cosmic Ray Intensity, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and CME Types, Their Interplanetary Manifestations (ICMEs) and Effects on Cosmic Ray Intensity will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1146041