Classical Vs Quantum Probability in Sequential Measurements

Physics – Quantum Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

56 pages, latex; revised and restructured. Version to appear in Found. Phys

Scientific paper

10.1007/s10701-006-9077-5

We demonstrate in this paper that the probabilities for sequential measurements have features very different from those of single-time measurements. First, they cannot be modelled by a classical stochastic process. Second, they are contextual, namely they depend strongly on the specific measurement scheme through which they are determined. We construct Positive-Operator-Valued measures (POVM) that provide such probabilities. For observables with continuous spectrum, the constructed POVMs depend strongly on the resolution of the measurement device, a conclusion that persists even if we consider a quantum mechanical measurement device or the presence of an environment. We then examine the same issues in alternative interpretations of quantum theory. We first show that multi-time probabilities cannot be naturally defined in terms of a frequency operator. We next prove that local hidden variable theories cannot reproduce the predictions of quantum theory for sequential measurements, even when the degrees of freedom of the measuring apparatus are taken into account. Bohmian mechanics, however, does not fall in this category. We finally examine an alternative proposal that sequential measurements can be modelled by a process that does not satisfy the Kolmogorov axioms of probability. This removes contextuality without introducing non-locality, but implies that the empirical probabilities cannot be always defined (the event frequencies do not converge). We argue that the predictions of this hypothesis are not ruled out by existing experimental results (examining in particular the "which way" experiments); they are, however, distinguishable in principle.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Classical Vs Quantum Probability in Sequential Measurements does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Classical Vs Quantum Probability in Sequential Measurements, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Classical Vs Quantum Probability in Sequential Measurements will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-193527

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.