Physics – Plasma Physics
Scientific paper
Nov 1996
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1996aps..dpp..4f14s&link_type=abstract
American Physical Society, Division of Plasma Physics Meeting, November 10-15, 1996, abstract #4F.14
Physics
Plasma Physics
Scientific paper
Differential equ. for ionization (IO) vs. charge exch. (CX) gives ions/neutr. density ratio, y = n+ / n0 vs. distance from plasma edge, x: y = [l_CX / ( l_IO - l_CX)] [exp (-l_IO x ) - exp (- l_CX x)]_.....; l_IO and l_CX are mean free paths. Between T(ion)=100 and 39 KeV (core) [1], ion impact ionization rate dominates [2]. In 10-100 KeV range, l_IO / l_CX >= 10. Eq.(1) predicts y=0.01, i.e. upper limit to plasma particle conf. time τ <= 10 μs. To explain reported (not measured) τ = 0.18s requires additional (non-classical) ionization =10 σ_IO. Without it, ignition of a beam heated DT plasma below 120 KeV would be impossible in principle. The absence of evidence for thermonuclear neutrons suggests a beam-on-target experiment; ``target'' = recycled hydrogenous deposits from TFTR walls. Submitted to Phys. Rev. Lett. as Comment (5/30/95) 1. R.J. Hawryluk et al., PRL 72, 3530 and 3526 (1994) 2. Atomic Data Bank, Div. Phys. and Chem. Sci., IAEA, Vienna
Maglich B. C.
Scott David W.
No associations
LandOfFree
Classical Interpretation of TFTR Data in Terms of General Equation for Ionization vs. Charge Exchange Requires Non-Classical Ionization.* does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Classical Interpretation of TFTR Data in Terms of General Equation for Ionization vs. Charge Exchange Requires Non-Classical Ionization.*, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Classical Interpretation of TFTR Data in Terms of General Equation for Ionization vs. Charge Exchange Requires Non-Classical Ionization.* will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1146654