Computer Science
Scientific paper
Oct 2004
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2004esasp.555e..94b&link_type=abstract
Proceedings of the 4th International Spacecraft Propulsion Conference (ESA SP-555). 2-9 June, 2004, Chia Laguna (Cagliari), Sard
Computer Science
Scientific paper
The European Space Agency (ESA) instigated the Aurora Solar System Exploration Programme in 2001. A cornerstone of the initial robotic phase of Aurora is Mars Sample Return, MSR. ESA has designed the first iteration of a "minimal complexity" (and cost) MSR mission centred around a dual Ariane V launch in 2011. Mission elements include an Orbiter, including an Earth return capsule, and separate descent module / Mars ascent vehicle composite will launch direct to Mars later. A Descent Module (DM) will propulsively slow the composite to a controlled soft landing near the Mars equator for a 14 week surface stay. A two stage Mars Ascent Vehicle (MAV) will then launch a 0.5kg Mars sample onto a rendezvous trajectory with the awaiting Orbiter upper stage for return to Earth. This paper critically examines the demanding propulsion requirements of the Orbiter, DM and MAV mission elements for the ESA MSR mission, which are all sent from Earth fully loaded with propellant. Design issues and suggested solutions from the inventory of European and non-European engines which have been identified in the first phase of the study are outlined. The Orbiter requires a high reliability high Isp engine of around 800N thrust and at least 50 restarts to minimise propulsive losses on the ~4ton platform during deceleration into Mars orbit. There are currently no European engines with this thrust level. The DM system is required to generate a total thrust of 8000-10000N (depending on the MAV mass), with an engine capable of throttling to ~10% of maximum thrust with a rapid response time. An Isp requirement has not been determined. Two MAV's of differing complexity and mass are being studied by European prime contractors, resulting in either first stage a thrust requirement of 2750 or 5500N, depending on the design. A comparable Isp to the Orbiter, in excess of 310s, is common to both, as is the survival a 14 week surface stay. All engines are intended to use storable liquid propellants. A preliminary table of engine options is included in this paper.
Baker Markus A.
Callot S.
Caramelli F.
Cervone A.
D'Agostino L.
No associations
LandOfFree
Chemical Propulsion Systems for Mars Sample Return does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Chemical Propulsion Systems for Mars Sample Return, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Chemical Propulsion Systems for Mars Sample Return will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-840717