Physics
Scientific paper
Sep 2006
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2006georl..3318314a&link_type=abstract
Geophysical Research Letters, Volume 33, Issue 18, CiteID L18314
Physics
3
Tectonophysics: Tectonics And Magmatism, Volcanology: Calderas, Volcanology: Experimental Volcanism
Scientific paper
Currently proposed caldera types (downsag, piston, funnel, piecemeal, trapdoor) are mainly based on field evidence and are each viewed as end-members. An overview of recent experiments on caldera formation, under different conditions, shows remarkably consistent results and suggests four experimental stages characterized by progressive subsidence. Distinctive structural features of each stage are found in many calderas, highlighting an overall consistency. The evolutionary stages adequately explain the architecture and development of the established caldera end-members along a continuum, where one or more end-member may correspond to a specific stage. While such a continuum is controlled by progressive subsidence, specific collapse geometries will result from secondary factors, such as roof aspect ratio, collapse symmetry and pre-existing faults.
No associations
LandOfFree
Caldera types: How end-members relate to evolutionary stages of collapse does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Caldera types: How end-members relate to evolutionary stages of collapse, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Caldera types: How end-members relate to evolutionary stages of collapse will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1079542