Physics – Geophysics
Scientific paper
Apr 1994
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1994jgr....99.6027t&link_type=abstract
Journal of Geophysical Research (ISSN 0148-0227), vol. 99, no. A4, p. 6027-6044
Physics
Geophysics
11
Auroral Arcs, Convective Flow, Electric Fields, Field Aligned Currents, Interplanetary Magnetic Fields, Ionospheric Currents, Magnetohydrodynamic Stability, Electron Energy, Electron Precipitation, Geophysics, Space Plasmas, Wave Interaction
Scientific paper
Using the Dynamics Explorer (DE) 2 magnetic and electric field and plasma data, B(sub y)- controlled convection and field-aligned currents in the midnight sector for northward interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) are examined. The results of an analysis of the electric field data show that when IMF is stable and when its magnitude is large, a coherent B(sub y)-controlled convection exists near the midnight auroral oval in the ionosphere having adequate conductivities. When B(sub y) is negative, the convection consists of a westward (eastward) plasma flow at the lower latitudes and an eastward (westward) plasma flow at the higher latitudes in the midnight sector in the northern (southern) ionosphere. When B(sub y) is positive, the flow directions are reversed. The distribution of the field-aligned currents associated with the B(sub y)-controlled convection, in most cases, shows a three-sheet structure. In accordance with the convection the directions of the three sheets are dependent on the sign of B(sub y). The location of disappearance of the precipitating intense electrons having energies of a few keV is close to the convection reversal surface. However, the more detailed relationship between the electron precipitation boundary and the convection reversal surface depends on the case. In some cases the precipitating electrons extend beyond the convection reversal surface, and in others the poleward boundary terminates at a latitude lower than the reversal surface. Previous studies suggest that the poleward boundary of the electrons having energies of a few keV is not necessarily coincident with an open/closed bounary. Thus the open/closed boundary may be at a latitude higher than the poleward boundary of the electron precipitation, or it may be at a latitude lower than the poleward boundary of the electron precipitation. We discuss relationships between the open/closed boundary and the convection reversal surface. When as a possible choice we adopt a view that the open/closed boundary agrees with the convection reversal surface, we can explain qualitatively the configuration of the B(sub y)-controlled convection on the open and close field line regions by proposing a mapping modified in accordance with IMF B(sub y).
David Winningham J.
Iyemori Toshihiko
Slavin James Arthur
Sugiura Muneo
Taguchi Satoshi
No associations
LandOfFree
By-controlled convection and field-aligned currents near midnight auroral oval for northward interplanetary magnetic field does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with By-controlled convection and field-aligned currents near midnight auroral oval for northward interplanetary magnetic field, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and By-controlled convection and field-aligned currents near midnight auroral oval for northward interplanetary magnetic field will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1258750