Bound entanglement maximally violating Bell inequalities: quantum entanglement is not equivalent to quantum security

Physics – Quantum Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Slightly improved version, title changed

Scientific paper

10.1103/PhysRevA.74.010305

It is shown that Smolin four-qubit bound entangled states [Phys. Rev. A, 63 032306 (2001)] can maximally violate two-setting Bell inequality similar to standard CHSH inequality. Surprisingly this entanglement does not allow for secure key distillation, so neither entanglement nor violation of Bell inequalities implies quantum security. It is also pointed out how that kind of bound entanglement can be useful in reducing communication complexity.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Bound entanglement maximally violating Bell inequalities: quantum entanglement is not equivalent to quantum security does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Bound entanglement maximally violating Bell inequalities: quantum entanglement is not equivalent to quantum security, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Bound entanglement maximally violating Bell inequalities: quantum entanglement is not equivalent to quantum security will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-368702

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.