Physics – Data Analysis – Statistics and Probability
Scientific paper
2004-08-30
Nucl.Instrum.Meth. A543 (2005) 577-584
Physics
Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability
6 pages, 5 figures; Accepted for publication in Nucl. Inst. & Meth. A
Scientific paper
10.1016/j.nima.2004.12.018
The efficacy of particle identification is compared using artificial neutral networks and boosted decision trees. The comparison is performed in the context of the MiniBooNE, an experiment at Fermilab searching for neutrino oscillations. Based on studies of Monte Carlo samples of simulated data, particle identification with boosting algorithms has better performance than that with artificial neural networks for the MiniBooNE experiment. Although the tests in this paper were for one experiment, it is expected that boosting algorithms will find wide application in physics.
Liu Ya-Ying
McGregor Gordon
Roe Byron P.
Stancu Ion
Yang Hai-Jun
No associations
LandOfFree
Boosted Decision Trees as an Alternative to Artificial Neural Networks for Particle Identification does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Boosted Decision Trees as an Alternative to Artificial Neural Networks for Particle Identification, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Boosted Decision Trees as an Alternative to Artificial Neural Networks for Particle Identification will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-512624