Biology – Quantitative Biology – Molecular Networks
Scientific paper
2009-01-29
Bioinformatics 2007 23: e177-e183
Biology
Quantitative Biology
Molecular Networks
Proceedings of the 2006 European Conference on Computational Biology, ECCB'06, Eilat, Israel, January 21-24, 2007
Scientific paper
10.1093/bioinformatics/btl301
Analogous to biological sequence comparison, comparing cellular networks is an important problem that could provide insight into biological understanding and therapeutics. For technical reasons, comparing large networks is computationally infeasible, and thus heuristics such as the degree distribution have been sought. It is easy to demonstrate that two networks are different by simply showing a short list of properties in which they differ. It is much harder to show that two networks are similar, as it requires demonstrating their similarity in all of their exponentially many properties. Clearly, it is computationally prohibitive to analyze all network properties, but the larger the number of constraints we impose in determining network similarity, the more likely it is that the networks will truly be similar. We introduce a new systematic measure of a network's local structure that imposes a large number of similarity constraints on networks being compared. In particular, we generalize the degree distribution, which measures the number of nodes 'touching' k edges, into distributions measuring the number of nodes 'touching' k graphlets, where graphlets are small connected non-isomorphic subgraphs of a large network. Our new measure of network local structure consists of 73 graphlet degree distributions (GDDs) of graphlets with 2-5 nodes, but it is easily extendible to a greater number of constraints (i.e. graphlets). Furthermore, we show a way to combine the 73 GDDs into a network 'agreement' measure. Based on this new network agreement measure, we show that almost all of the 14 eukaryotic PPI networks, including human, are better modeled by geometric random graphs than by Erdos-Reny, random scale-free, or Barabasi-Albert scale-free networks.
No associations
LandOfFree
Biological network comparison using graphlet degree distribution does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Biological network comparison using graphlet degree distribution, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Biological network comparison using graphlet degree distribution will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-13066