Physics – Geophysics
Scientific paper
Dec 2008
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2008georl..3523502b&link_type=abstract
Geophysical Research Letters, Volume 35, Issue 23, CiteID L23502
Physics
Geophysics
Cryosphere: Snow (1827, 1863), Cryosphere: Avalanches, Nonlinear Geophysics: Chaos (7805), Nonlinear Geophysics: Scaling: Spatial And Temporal (1872, 3270, 4277)
Scientific paper
The literature disagrees about the statistical distribution of snow avalanche crown depths. Large datasets from Mammoth Mountain, California and the Westwide Avalanche Network show that the three-parameter generalized extreme value distribution provides the most robust fit, followed by a two-parameter variation, the Fréchet distribution. The most parsimonious explanation is neither self-organized criticality nor other complex cascades, but the maximum domain of attraction, implying that distributions of individual avalanche crown depths are scaling. We also show that crown depths do not have a universal tail index. Rather, they range from 2.8 to 4.6 over different avalanche paths, consistent with other geophysical phenomena such as wildfires, which show similar variability.
Bair Edward H.
Birkeland Karl W.
Dozier Jeff
No associations
LandOfFree
Avalanche crown-depth distributions does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Avalanche crown-depth distributions, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Avalanche crown-depth distributions will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-966950