Physics
Scientific paper
Nov 2009
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2009jgra..11411206h&link_type=abstract
Journal of Geophysical Research, Volume 114, Issue A11, CiteID A11206
Physics
6
Planetary Sciences: Solar System Objects: Uranus, Planetary Sciences: Fluid Planets: Aurorae, Planetary Sciences: Fluid Planets: Magnetic Fields And Magnetism, Planetary Sciences: Fluid Planets: Magnetospheres (2756), Planetary Sciences: Fluid Planets: Interactions With Particles And Fields
Scientific paper
Resolution of the details of a planetary magnetic field from magnetometer measurements made during a single flyby can be severely limited because of the incomplete geometrical sampling of the planetary neighborhood by the flyby trajectory. This problem was especially severe for the only spacecraft encounter with Uranus, that of Voyager 2 in 1986. Fortunately, auroras at the magnetic field line footprints serve as additional constraints that may be used to determine the higher multipole moments of planetary fields (Connerney et al.'s (1998) VIP-4 model of for Jupiter). In the present work, this approach is applied to improving the resolution of the magnetic field of Uranus. The auroral emission distribution at Uranus is determined from scans by the Voyager 2 Ultraviolet Spectrometer (UVS), enhancing an earlier analysis by Herbert and Sandel (1994) by incorporating more observations and by using more powerful analysis techniques. The resulting new determination of the auroral ovals is well correlated with the field lines associated with the strongest plasma wave and radio emissions but differs from model ovals computed by Connerney et al. (1987) from the Q3 magnetic field model for Uranus. Consequently, a search has been initiated for model coefficients of the planetary magnetic field that agree both with the magnetic field observations and also with the reasonable assumption that the newly determined auroral emissions lie at the magnetic footprints of an equidistant circum-Uranian region of the magnetosphere. The dipole and quadrupole terms of the new field model, termed AH5, are similar to those of the dipole + quadrupole Q3 model, but the AH5 higher multipole terms diverge from the dipole + quadrupole + octupole I3E1 model of Connerney et al. (1987), from which the Q3 model was derived. Inasmuch as the I3E1 octupole terms were not resolved, the AH5 model derived here comprises a first estimate of the higher multipole moments of Uranus's magnetic field.
No associations
LandOfFree
Aurora and magnetic field of Uranus does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Aurora and magnetic field of Uranus, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Aurora and magnetic field of Uranus will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1266510