Are Recoil Polarization Measurements of $G_E^p/G_M^p$ Consistent With Rosenbluth Separation Data?

Physics – Nuclear Physics – Nuclear Experiment

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

4 pages, 1 figure, to appear in the proceedings of the 9th International Conference on the Structure of Baryons, Jefferson Lab

Scientific paper

Recent recoil polarization measurements in Hall A at Jefferson Lab show that the ratio of the electric to magnetic form factors for the proton decreases significantly with increasing Q^2. This contradicts previous Rosenbluth measurements which indicate approximate scaling of the form factors. The cross section measurements were reanalyzed to try and understand the source of this discrepancy. We find that the various Rosenbluth measurements are consistent with each other when normalization uncertainties are taken into account and that the discrepancy cannot simply be the result of errors in one or two data sets. If there is a problem in the Rosenbluth data, it must be a systematic, epsilon-dependent uncertainty affecting several experiments.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Are Recoil Polarization Measurements of $G_E^p/G_M^p$ Consistent With Rosenbluth Separation Data? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Are Recoil Polarization Measurements of $G_E^p/G_M^p$ Consistent With Rosenbluth Separation Data?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Are Recoil Polarization Measurements of $G_E^p/G_M^p$ Consistent With Rosenbluth Separation Data? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-560621

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.