Physics – Physics Education
Scientific paper
2007-11-12
Physics
Physics Education
13 pages, 7 figures, submitted to Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res; Revised: 12 pages, 9 figures, submitted to Phys. Rev. ST Phys
Scientific paper
10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.020101
We suggest one redefinition of common clusters of questions used to analyze student responses on the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation (FMCE). Our goal is to move beyond the expert/novice analysis of student learning based on pre-/post-testing and the correctness of responses (either on the overall test or on clusters of questions defined solely by content). We use a resources framework, taking special note of the contextual and representational dependence of questions with seemingly similar physics content. We analyze clusters in ways that allow the most common incorrect answers to give as much, or more, information as the correctness of responses in that cluster. Furthermore, we show that false positives can be found, especially on questions dealing with Newton's Third Law.
Smith Trevor I.
Wittmann Michael C.
No associations
LandOfFree
Applying a resources framework to analysis of the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Applying a resources framework to analysis of the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Applying a resources framework to analysis of the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-129212