Anomalies in experimental data for the EPR-Bohm experiment: Are both classical and quantum mechanics wrong?

Physics – Quantum Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Presented in talks at conferences: "Foundations of Probability and Physics-4" (Vaxjo, Sweden, June 2006), "Quantum Probability

Scientific paper

We analyze anomalies in data to test the violation of Bell's inequality for the EPR-Bohm experiment. We found that the experimental correlations for photon polarization have an intriguing property. In the experimental data there are visible non-negligible deviations of probabilities $P_{++}^{\rm{exp}}(\alpha, \beta), P_{+-}^{\rm{exp}}(\alpha, \beta), P_{-+}^{\rm{exp}}(\alpha, \beta), P_{--}^{\rm{exp}}(\alpha, \beta) $ from the predictions of quantum mechanics, namely, $P_{++}(\alpha, \beta)=P_{--}(\alpha, \beta)= {1/2}\cos^2(\alpha-\beta)$ and $P_{+-}=P_{-+}(\alpha, \beta)={1/2}\sin^2(\alpha-\beta).$ However, in some mysterious way those deviations compensate each other and finally the correlation $E^{\rm{exp}}(\alpha, \beta)= P_{++}^{\rm{exp}}(\alpha, \beta)- P_{+-}^{\rm{exp}}(\alpha, \beta)- P_{-+}^{\rm{exp}}(\alpha, \beta)+ P_{--}^{\rm{exp}}(\alpha, \beta)$ is in the complete agreement with the QM-prediction, namely, $E(\alpha, \beta)= P_{++}(\alpha, \beta)- P_{+-}(\alpha, \beta)- P_{-+}(\alpha, \beta)+ P_{--}(\alpha, \beta)= \cos 2(\alpha-\beta).$ Therefore such anomalies play no role in the Bell's inequality framework. Nevertheless, other linear combinations of experimental probabilities do not have such a compensation property. There can be found non-negligible deviations from predictions of quantum mechanics. Thus neither classical nor quantum model can pass the whole family of statistical tests given by all possible linear combinations of the EPR-Bohm probabilities. Does it mean that both models are wrong?

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Anomalies in experimental data for the EPR-Bohm experiment: Are both classical and quantum mechanics wrong? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Anomalies in experimental data for the EPR-Bohm experiment: Are both classical and quantum mechanics wrong?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Anomalies in experimental data for the EPR-Bohm experiment: Are both classical and quantum mechanics wrong? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-665778

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.