Physics – Quantum Physics
Scientific paper
2007-04-13
Physics
Quantum Physics
there is a mistake in the proof, and even worse... one can find a counterexample
Scientific paper
Derivation of the full set of Bell inequalities involving correlation functions, for two parties, with binary observables, and N possible local settings is not as easy as it seemed. The proof of v1 is wrong. Additionaly one can find a counterexample, which will be presented soon. Thus our thesis is dead. Still the series of Bell inequalities discussed in the manuscript (v1) form a necessary condition for local realism, and are tight. They are tight and complete (sufficient) only for N=3 settings per observer (as shown in quant-ph/0611086, fortunately using an entirely different approach).
Badziag Piotr
Zukowski Marek
No associations
LandOfFree
All tight multipartite Bell correlation inequalities for an arbitrary number of dichotomic observables per observer does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with All tight multipartite Bell correlation inequalities for an arbitrary number of dichotomic observables per observer, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and All tight multipartite Bell correlation inequalities for an arbitrary number of dichotomic observables per observer will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-678644