A systematic study of the fusion barriers using different proximity type potentials for $N = Z$ colliding nuclei : New extensions

Physics – Nuclear Physics – Nuclear Theory

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Number of Figures =6, 1 text file

Scientific paper

10.1103/PhysRevC.81.044615

By using 14 different versions and parametrizations of a proximity potential and two new versions of the potential proposed in this paper, we perform a comparative study of fusion barriers by studying 26 symmetric reactions. The mass asymmetry $\eta_{A}$ = $(\frac{A_{2}-A_{1}}{A_{2}+A_{1}}),$ however, is very large. Our detailed investigation reveals that most of the proximity potentials reproduce experimental data within $\pm$8% on the average. A comparison of fusion cross sections indicates that Bass 80, AW 95, and Denisov DP potentials have a better edge than other potentials. We also propose new versions of the proximity potential as well as Denisov parametrized potential. These new versions improve the agreement with the data.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

A systematic study of the fusion barriers using different proximity type potentials for $N = Z$ colliding nuclei : New extensions does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with A systematic study of the fusion barriers using different proximity type potentials for $N = Z$ colliding nuclei : New extensions, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and A systematic study of the fusion barriers using different proximity type potentials for $N = Z$ colliding nuclei : New extensions will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-448824

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.