A Substantial Bias in Nonparametric Tests for Periodicity in Geophysical Data

Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

18

Scientific paper

A nonparametric test that has been used to conclude that extinction rates are periodic with a period of 26 million years is shown to be substantially biased toward this conclusion, regardless of whether or not the data are periodic in origin (and, indeed, regardless of the actual period if they are in fact periodic). The test is shown to be sensitive to measurement error of a type expected with these data (early recording of extinctions due to missing fossil specimens, the ``Signor-Lipps effect''), and it is shown that because of the unequal spacing in time, such models may be expected to produce statistically significant but artifactual periods of (in this case) exactly 26 million years over the span of time actually used.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

A Substantial Bias in Nonparametric Tests for Periodicity in Geophysical Data does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with A Substantial Bias in Nonparametric Tests for Periodicity in Geophysical Data, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and A Substantial Bias in Nonparametric Tests for Periodicity in Geophysical Data will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1716125

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.