Physics
Scientific paper
Nov 1987
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1987sci...238..940s&link_type=abstract
Science, Volume 238, Issue 4829, pp. 940-945
Physics
18
Scientific paper
A nonparametric test that has been used to conclude that extinction rates are periodic with a period of 26 million years is shown to be substantially biased toward this conclusion, regardless of whether or not the data are periodic in origin (and, indeed, regardless of the actual period if they are in fact periodic). The test is shown to be sensitive to measurement error of a type expected with these data (early recording of extinctions due to missing fossil specimens, the ``Signor-Lipps effect''), and it is shown that because of the unequal spacing in time, such models may be expected to produce statistically significant but artifactual periods of (in this case) exactly 26 million years over the span of time actually used.
Stigler Stephen M.
Wagner Melissa J.
No associations
LandOfFree
A Substantial Bias in Nonparametric Tests for Periodicity in Geophysical Data does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with A Substantial Bias in Nonparametric Tests for Periodicity in Geophysical Data, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and A Substantial Bias in Nonparametric Tests for Periodicity in Geophysical Data will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1716125