Physics
Scientific paper
Jul 2008
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2008soph..250..159l&link_type=abstract
Solar Physics, Volume 250, Issue 1, pp.159-170
Physics
10
Sun: Euv Emission, Sun: Solar Wind
Scientific paper
Various solar wind forecasting methods have been developed during the past decade, such as the Wang Sheeley model and the Hakamada Akasofu Fry Version 2 (HAFv2) model. Also, considerable correlation has been found between the solar wind speed v and the coronal hole (CH) area A M on the visible side of the Sun, showing quantitative improvement of forecasting accuracy in low CME activity periods ( e.g., Vršnak, Temmer, and Veronig, Solar Phys. 240, 315, 2007a). Properties of lower layers of the solar atmosphere are good indications of the subsequent interplanetary and geomagnetic activities. We analyze the SOHO/EIT 284 Å images and construct a new forecasting factor (Pch) from the brightness of the solar EUV emission, and a good correlation is found between the Pch factor and the 3-day-lag solar wind velocity ( v) probed by the ACE spacecraft. The main difference between the Pch and A M factor is that Pch does not depend on the CH-boundary estimate and can reflect both the area and brightness of CH. A simple method of forecasting the solar wind speed near Earth in low CME activity periods is presented. Between Pch and v from 21 November until 26 December 2003, the linear correlation coefficient is R=0.89. For comparison we also analyze the data in the same period (DOY 25 125, 2005) as Vršnak, Temmer, and Veronig ( Solar Phys. 240, 315, 2007a), who used the CH areas A M for predicting the solar wind parameters. In this period the correlation coefficient between Pch and v is R=0.70, whereas for A M and v the correlation coefficient is R=0.62. The average relative difference between the calculated and the observed values is overline{|δ|}≈ 12.15% . Furthermore, for the ten peaks during the analysis period, Pch and v show a correlation coefficient of R=0.78, and the average relative difference between the calculated and the observed peak values is overline{|δ|}≈ 5.83% . Moreover, the Pch factor can eliminate personal bias in the forecasting process, which existed in the method using CH area as input parameter, because CH area depends on the CH-boundary estimate but Pch does not. Until now the CH-boundary could not be easily determined since no quantitative criteria can be used to precisely locate CHs from observations, which led to differences in forecasting accuracy.
Gong Jiancun
Liu Siqing
Luo Bingxian
Zhong Qiuzhen
No associations
LandOfFree
A New Forecasting Index for Solar Wind Velocity Based on EIT 284 Å Observations does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with A New Forecasting Index for Solar Wind Velocity Based on EIT 284 Å Observations, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and A New Forecasting Index for Solar Wind Velocity Based on EIT 284 Å Observations will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-789107