A General Argument Against the Universal Validity of the Superposition Principle

Physics – Quantum Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

17 pages, Latex, to appear in Phys. Lett. A

Scientific paper

10.1016/S0375-9601(00)00612-5

We reconsider a well known problem of quantum theory, i.e. the so called measurement (or macro-objectification) problem, and we rederive the fact that it gives rise to serious problems of interpretation. The novelty of our approach derives from the fact that the relevant conclusion is obtained in a completely general way, in particular, without resorting to any of the assumptions of ideality which are usually done for the measurement process. The generality and unescapability of our assumptions (we take into account possible malfunctionings of the apparatus, its unavoidable entanglement with the environmment, its high but not absolute reliability, its fundamentally uncontrollable features) allow to draw the conclusion that the very possibility of performing measurements on a microsystem combined with the assumed general validity of the linear nature of quantum evolution leads to a fundamental contradiction.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

A General Argument Against the Universal Validity of the Superposition Principle does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with A General Argument Against the Universal Validity of the Superposition Principle, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and A General Argument Against the Universal Validity of the Superposition Principle will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-433629

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.