A double-slit `which-way' experiment on the complementarity--uncertainty debate

Details A double-slit `which-way' experiment on the complementarity--uncertainty debate A double-slit `which-way' experiment on the complementarity--uncertainty debate

2007-06-27

arxiv.org/abs/0706.3966v2

New J. Phys. 9 (2007) 287.

Physics

Quantum Physics

13 pages, 4 figures

Scientific paper

10.1088/1367-2630/9/8/287

A which-way measurement in Young's double-slit will destroy the interference pattern. Bohr claimed this complementarity between wave- and particle behaviour is enforced by Heisenberg's uncertainty principle: distinguishing two positions a distance s apart transfers a random momentum q \sim \hbar/s to the particle. This claim has been subject to debate: Scully et al. asserted that in some situations interference can be destroyed with no momentum transfer, while Storey et al. asserted that Bohr's stance is always valid. We address this issue using the experimental technique of weak measurement. We measure a distribution for q that spreads well beyond [-\hbar/s, \hbar/s], but nevertheless has a variance consistent with zero. This weakvalued momentum-transfer distribution P_{wv}(q) thus reflects both sides of the debate.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

A double-slit `which-way' experiment on the complementarity--uncertainty debate does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with A double-slit `which-way' experiment on the complementarity--uncertainty debate, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and A double-slit `which-way' experiment on the complementarity--uncertainty debate will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-255692