A counter-argument to "Hidden variable models for quantum theory cannot have any local part" arXiv:0801.2218

Physics – Quantum Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

4 pages, 1 figure

Scientific paper

Colbeck and Renner [arXiv:0801.2218] analyzed a class of combined models for entanglements in which local and non-local hidden variables cooperate for producing the measurement results. They came to the conclusion that the measurement results are fully independent of the local components of the hidden variables. Their conclusion is based mainly on an assumption on the local hidden variables, assumption similar to the non-signaling property of probabilities of observables' values. In the present text it is proved that hidden variables are not observables, so their distributions of probabilities do not necessarily possess the non-signaling property. Also, a counter-example is brought to the Colbeck and Renner assumption, showing that their type of models and conclusion are not general. The question whether hidden variables, local or non-local, exist or not, remains open.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

A counter-argument to "Hidden variable models for quantum theory cannot have any local part" arXiv:0801.2218 does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with A counter-argument to "Hidden variable models for quantum theory cannot have any local part" arXiv:0801.2218, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and A counter-argument to "Hidden variable models for quantum theory cannot have any local part" arXiv:0801.2218 will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-332189

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.