A Contextual Risk Model for the Ellsberg Paradox

Details A Contextual Risk Model for the Ellsberg Paradox A Contextual Risk Model for the Ellsberg Paradox

2011-05-09

arxiv.org/abs/1105.1814v1

Physics

Physics and Society

6 pages, 1 figure

Scientific paper

The Allais and Ellsberg paradoxes show that the expected utility hypothesis and Savage's Sure-Thing Principle are violated in real life decisions. The popular explanation in terms of 'ambiguity aversion' is not completely accepted. On the other hand, we have recently introduced a notion of 'contextual risk' to mathematically capture what is known as 'ambiguity' in the economics literature. Situations in which contextual risk occurs cannot be modeled by Kolmogorovian classical probabilistic structures, but a non-Kolmogorovian framework with a quantum-like structure is needed. We prove in this paper that the contextual risk approach can be applied to the Ellsberg paradox, and elaborate a 'sphere model' within our 'hidden measurement formalism' which reveals that it is the overall conceptual landscape that is responsible of the disagreement between actual human decisions and the predictions of expected utility theory, which generates the paradox. This result points to the presence of a 'quantum conceptual layer' in human thought which is superposed to the usually assumed 'classical logical layer'.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

A Contextual Risk Model for the Ellsberg Paradox does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with A Contextual Risk Model for the Ellsberg Paradox, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and A Contextual Risk Model for the Ellsberg Paradox will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-278377