Physics
Scientific paper
Mar 2003
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2003jastp..65..409g&link_type=abstract
Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, Volume 65, Issue 4, p. 409-416.
Physics
1
Scientific paper
The results derived from processing vertical-incidence ionograms obtained with the chirp-ionosonde at Irkutsk for different winter time intervals (February) and at equinox are presented. The peak height hmF2 was determined by Dudeney's formula based on ionogram parameters, including the coefficient M(3000). The algorithm is suggested for determining the coefficient M(3000) in the automatic mode using the conventional form of the transfer curve method without invoking a standard transparency called the ``transfer curve''. The parameters foF2 and hmF2 are compared with the international reference ionosphere (IRI-95) model. It is found that in most cases the values of the foF2 and hmF2 parameters, calculated in the IRI-95 model, are similar to the median ones. It is confirmed that for practical purposes where it is necessary to know the radio wave propagation conditions along the propagation path, the IRI model is convenient and attractive.
Grozov V. P.
Kotovich G. V.
No associations
LandOfFree
A comparison of results derived from scaling VS chirp-ionosonde ionograms with the international reference ionosphere (IRI) does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with A comparison of results derived from scaling VS chirp-ionosonde ionograms with the international reference ionosphere (IRI), we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and A comparison of results derived from scaling VS chirp-ionosonde ionograms with the international reference ionosphere (IRI) will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1004881