Physics
Scientific paper
Jul 2000
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2000jgr...10517601j&link_type=abstract
Journal of Geophysical Research, Volume 105, Issue E7, p. 17601-17616
Physics
9
Meteorology And Atmospheric Dynamics: Planetary Meteorology, Planetology: Solid Surface Planets: Atmospheres-Structure And Dynamics, Planetology: Solid Surface Planets: Meteorology
Scientific paper
The NASA Ames Mars general circulation model (MGCM) is used to investigate how different phenomena in the Martian climate system combine to produce temperature profiles measured by the Radioscience Instrument (RS) aboard Mars Global Surveyor (MGS) in early 1998. When integrated with dust amounts consistent with Thermal Emission Spectrometer (TES) observations, and with a topography data set determined from the Mars Orbiting Laser Altimeter (MOLA), modeled temperature profiles are within 5-10 K of observations. Modeled and measured profiles in the winter subtropics are warmer than pure radiative-convective considerations suggest, providing further evidence of strong dynamical warming associated with descent in the Hadley cell. South of 40°S, the best fit to the data is obtained by confining airborne dust to below 2 scale heights in this region. The differences in the strength of low-level inversions found in the MGCM and in the RS data indicate the presence of either a low-level radiative cooling mechanism such as isolated dust clouds or water-ice clouds, or a dynamical mechanism such as low-level gravity wave drag. When initialized with a mean surface pressure that gives the best fit to Viking lander measurements, the model matches RS surface pressure data to within 0.1 mbar. This consistency is a further validation of the MGCM and shows how GCMs can be used to interpret measurements of surface pressure taken at different locations using different methods.
Haberle Robert
Hinson David
Hollingsworth Jeffery
Joshi Manoj
No associations
LandOfFree
A comparison of MGS Phase 1 aerobraking radio occultation data and the NASA Ames Mars GCM does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with A comparison of MGS Phase 1 aerobraking radio occultation data and the NASA Ames Mars GCM, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and A comparison of MGS Phase 1 aerobraking radio occultation data and the NASA Ames Mars GCM will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1722050