Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
1999-12-06
Astrophys.J.535:L13-L16,2000
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
aastex, 10 pages, 1 table, 1 figure, revised version, accepted in ApJL
Scientific paper
10.1086/312702
Nine of the most important estimators known for the two-point correlation function are compared using a predetermined, rigorous criterion. The indicators were extracted from over 500 subsamples of the Virgo Hubble Volume simulation cluster catalog. The ``real'' correlation function was determined from the full survey in a 3000Mpc/h periodic cube. The estimators were ranked by the cumulative probability of returning a value within a certain tolerance of the real correlation function. This criterion takes into account bias and variance, and it is independent of the possibly non-Gaussian nature of the error statistics. As a result for astrophysical applications a clear recommendation has emerged: the Landy & Szalay (1993) estimator, in its original or grid version Szapudi & Szalay (1998), are preferred in comparison to the other indicators examined, with a performance almost indistinguishable from the Hamilton (1993) estimator.
Kerscher Martin
Szalay Alex
Szapudi István
No associations
LandOfFree
A comparison of estimators for the two-point correlation function does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with A comparison of estimators for the two-point correlation function, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and A comparison of estimators for the two-point correlation function will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-573415