Physics – Plasma Physics
Scientific paper
Nov 2005
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2005georl..3222804d&link_type=abstract
Geophysical Research Letters, Volume 32, Issue 22, CiteID L22804
Physics
Plasma Physics
79
Atmospheric Processes: Atmospheric Electricity, Atmospheric Processes: Lightning, Atmospheric Processes: Theoretical Modeling, Space Plasma Physics: Charged Particle Motion And Acceleration
Scientific paper
Monte Carlo simulations of the runaway breakdown of air are used to calculate the spectra of terrestrial gamma-ray flashes (TGFs), which are then compared with RHESSI and CGRO/BATSE observations. It is found that the recent RHESSI spectrum is not consistent with a source altitude above 24 km but can be well fit by a source in the range of 15-21 km, depending upon the electric field geometry of the source. Because 15 km is not unusual for the tops of thunderstorms, especially at low latitudes, and is lower than typical minimum sprite altitudes, the RHESSI data imply that thunderstorms and not sprites may be the source of these TGFs. On the other hand, the soft energy spectrum seen in some BATSE TGFs is inconsistent with such large atmospheric depths, indicating that there may exist two distinct sources of TGFs, with altitudes below 21 km and above 30 km.
Dwyer Joesph R.
Smith Masson D.
No associations
LandOfFree
A comparison between Monte Carlo simulations of runaway breakdown and terrestrial gamma-ray flash observations does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with A comparison between Monte Carlo simulations of runaway breakdown and terrestrial gamma-ray flash observations, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and A comparison between Monte Carlo simulations of runaway breakdown and terrestrial gamma-ray flash observations will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1658295