Physics – High Energy Physics – High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
Scientific paper
2005-02-04
Physics
High Energy Physics
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
Revtex 5 pages and 5 figures, Added some results and references
Scientific paper
A Comparative study of the strengths and weakness of the models of fireball formation namely the statistical model of Ramanathan et.al (Physical Review C 70, 027903, 2004) and the approximation schemes of Kapusta et. al (Physical Review D 46, 1379, 1992) and its subsequent improved variants is made. The way to complement the various approximation schemes, in order to enhance their utility in the phenomenological analysis of QGP data that are expected from ongoing URHIC experiments, is suggested. The calculations demonstrate a striking QCD behaviour of the surface tension of the QGP droplet resulting in its increase with temperature, which is due to the confining nature of QCD forces at the surface and the interface surface tension varies as the cube of the transition temperature which is in conformity with the results of Lattice QCD simulations.
Gupta Kapil Kumar
Jha Agam K.
Mathur Y. K.
Ramanathan Ravishankar
Singh Sumeetpal S.
No associations
LandOfFree
A Comparative Study of Two Models of QGP-Fireball Formation does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with A Comparative Study of Two Models of QGP-Fireball Formation, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and A Comparative Study of Two Models of QGP-Fireball Formation will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-528043