Physics
Scientific paper
Feb 1977
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1977jgr....82..561k&link_type=abstract
Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 82, Feb. 1, 1977, p. 561-577.
Physics
12
Cosmic Rays, Interplanetary Magnetic Fields, Magnetic Storms, Solar Wind, Forbush Decreases, Neutron Counters, Particle Intensity, Plasma Density, Shock Wave Propagation
Scientific paper
Major geomagnetic storms (Dst change exceeding 60 gamma) and cosmic ray storms (changes exceeding 3% for the Alert neutron monitor) are compared for the period November 1965 through August 1973. The parameters of the two phenomena show virtually no intercorrelation. Interplanetary disturbances, characterized by enhanced number density and speed of solar wind and enhanced magnetic field, are responsible for both these phenomena. For cosmic ray storms, only an interplanetary magnetic blob seems in general to be necessary. However, the quantitative relationship between the total magnetic field and cosmic ray storm magnitudes is poor, and occasionally large blobs produce very small cosmic ray effects or vice versa, often not simultaneously.
No associations
LandOfFree
A comparative study of geomagnetic, interplanetary, and cosmic ray storms does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with A comparative study of geomagnetic, interplanetary, and cosmic ray storms, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and A comparative study of geomagnetic, interplanetary, and cosmic ray storms will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-800194