Physics – High Energy Physics – High Energy Physics - Theory
Scientific paper
2006-10-18
JCAP 0701:004,2007
Physics
High Energy Physics
High Energy Physics - Theory
24 pages, LaTeX, 8 references added and a distinction between Linde's and Vilenkin's tunneling proposals
Scientific paper
10.1088/1475-7516/2007/01/004
Given the observed cosmic acceleration, Leonard Susskind has presented the following argument against the Hartle-Hawking no-boundary proposal for the quantum state of the universe: It should most likely lead to a nearly empty large de Sitter universe, rather than to early rapid inflation. Even if one adds the condition of observers, they are most likely to form by quantum fluctuations in de Sitter and therefore not see the structure that we observe. Here I present my own amplified version of this argument and consider possible resolutions, one of which seems to imply that inflation expands the universe to be larger than 10^{10^{10^{122}}} Mpc.
No associations
LandOfFree
Susskind's Challenge to the Hartle-Hawking No-Boundary Proposal and Possible Resolutions does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Susskind's Challenge to the Hartle-Hawking No-Boundary Proposal and Possible Resolutions, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Susskind's Challenge to the Hartle-Hawking No-Boundary Proposal and Possible Resolutions will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-99697