Physics
Scientific paper
Sep 1978
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1978pepi...17..163b&link_type=abstract
Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, Volume 17, Issue 2, p. 163-181.
Physics
3
Scientific paper
Surface-wave amplitudes in the period range 50-100 s at eight European and North American stations, horizontal slip profiles along the rupture zone and the timing of certain events along the fault during rupture time are all engaged in unison to reconstruct the motion at the source. A modified source model is used to accommodate a moving rupture with variable dislocation in the direction of propagation. It is inferred that the rupture started at about 13 h 11 m 55 s GMT near San Juan Bautista and propagated unilaterally northwestward along N35°W over 400 km with an average rupture velocity of 3.5 km/s. At 13 h 12 m 12 s, the dynamic shear front, moving with the rupture speed, hit the Lick Observatory. Then, at 13 h 12 m 18 s, the rupture arrived to the vicinity of the epicenter in the Santa Cruz Mountains given by B. Bolt. There the slip changed sharply from an average of 0.5 m to a high value of 3 m causing extensive landslides and avalanches. At 13 h 12 m 32.5 s two railroad clocks at San Rafael were stopped. Finally, at 13 h 12 m 36 s the offset front hit the Naval Observatory at Mare Island and stopped the astronomical clocks there. Conspicuous surface waves, visible on Wiechert seismograms in Europe in the period range 55-65 s, reflect the true rupture time. The seismic data inversion yields an effective radiation source some 240 km long with an average vertical extent of some 34 km over a total fault length of 400 km (UdS ⋍ 29,000 m km2 or μUdS ⋍ 9 . 1027 dyn cm). It began at the Santa Cruz Mountains and ended some 20 km off coast Point Arena. Thus, due to the nonuniform slip profile, only 3/5 of the total fracture length contributed to the far radiation field. Although the product of the average source displacement (over the entire fault) and the vertical extent appears to be fairly well determined from the surface-wave spectrums, the separate values of these entities cannot be uniquely determined. If the average surface displacements (~ 3.2 m) are diagnostic of the entire fault, a vertical extent of H = 34 km is required. Finally, a new analysis of surface waves from the Alaska earthquake of July 10, 1958, the Queen Charlotte Islands earthquake of August 22, 1949 and the Kern County shock of July 21, 1952, enables us to draw parallels between the three biggest major events which occurred along the NE Pacific coast during 1906-1958. A common feature of all of these earthquakes is that vertical failure extents of 30-40 km are implied.
No associations
LandOfFree
Source mechanism of the 1906 San Francisco earthquake does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Source mechanism of the 1906 San Francisco earthquake, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Source mechanism of the 1906 San Francisco earthquake will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-943055