Physics – Quantum Physics
Scientific paper
2000-04-04
Physics
Quantum Physics
82 pages,1 figure (contaaining a copy of a letter from J.S. Bell)
Scientific paper
In spite \smallskip of their popularity the \QTR{bf}{H}eisenberg's (``uncertainty'') \QTR{bf}{R}elations (HR) still generate controversies. The \QTR{bf}{T}raditional \QTR{bf}{I}nterpretation of HR (TIHR) dominate our days science, although over the years a lot of its defects were signaled. These facts justify a reinvestigation of the questions connected with the interpretation / significance of HR. Here it is developped such a reinvestigation starting with a revaluation of the main elements of TIHR. So one finds that all the respective elements are troubled by insurmountable defects. Then it results the indubitable failure of TIHR and the necessity of its abandonment. Consequently the HR must be deprived of their quality of crucial physical formulae. Moreover the HR are shown to be nothing but simple fluctuations formulae with natural analogous in classical (non-quantum) physics. The description of the maesuring uncertainties (traditionally associated with HR) is approached from a new informational perspective. The Planck's constant $\hbar $ (also associated with HR) is revealed to have a significance of generic indicator for quantum stochasticity, similarly with the role of Boltzmann's constant k in respect with the thermal stochasticity.
No associations
LandOfFree
A genuine reinterpretation of the Heisenberg's ("uncertainty") relations does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with A genuine reinterpretation of the Heisenberg's ("uncertainty") relations, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and A genuine reinterpretation of the Heisenberg's ("uncertainty") relations will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-73316