Physics – Quantum Physics
Scientific paper
2007-11-09
Phys. Rev. A v. 77, 022318 (2008)
Physics
Quantum Physics
21 pages, 16 figures
Scientific paper
10.1103/PhysRevA.77.022318
We study the influence of errors and decoherence on both the performance of Shor's factoring algorithm and Grover's search algorithm, and on the amount of interference in these algorithms using a recently proposed interference measure. We consider systematic unitary errors, random unitary errors, and decoherence processes. We show that unitary errors which destroy the interference destroy the efficiency of the algorithm, too. However, unitary errors may also create useless additional interference. In such a case the total amount of interference can increase, while the efficiency of the quantum computation decreases. For decoherence due to phase flip errors, interference is destroyed for small error probabilities, and converted into destructive interference for error probabilities approaching one, leading to success probabilities which can even drop below the classical value. Our results show that in general interference is necessary in order for a quantum algorithm to outperform classical computation, but large amounts of interference are not sufficient and can even lead to destructive interference with worse than classical success rates.
Braun Daniel
Georgeot Bertrand
No associations
LandOfFree
Interference versus success probability in quantum algorithms with imperfections does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Interference versus success probability in quantum algorithms with imperfections, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Interference versus success probability in quantum algorithms with imperfections will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-702769