Reply to comment by A.V. Kildishev et al. [physics/0609234] and V. M. Shalaev et al. [Opt. Lett. 30, 3345 (2005)]

Details Reply to comment by A.V. Kildishev et al. [physics/0609234] and V. M. Shalaev et al. [Opt. Lett. 30, 3345 (2005)] Reply to comment by A.V. Kildishev et al. [physics/0609234] and V. M. Shalaev et al. [Opt. Lett. 30, 3345 (2005)]

2006-12-04

arxiv.org/abs/physics/0612028v2

Physics

Optics

12 pages, 1 figure

Scientific paper

We discuss the claims of the comment at arXiv.org:physics/0609234. We show that A.V. Kildishev et al. misread our method of extracting of optical constants of nanostructured films. The theoretical calculations performed in the comment appear to be in a direct contradiction with an experiment. We demonstrate that the theoretical calculations suggested being free from ambiguities (V.M. Shalaev et al., Opt. Lett. 30, 3345 (2005)) require an additional experimental verification, which can be performed by observing physical effects of negative refraction.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Reply to comment by A.V. Kildishev et al. [physics/0609234] and V. M. Shalaev et al. [Opt. Lett. 30, 3345 (2005)] does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Reply to comment by A.V. Kildishev et al. [physics/0609234] and V. M. Shalaev et al. [Opt. Lett. 30, 3345 (2005)], we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Reply to comment by A.V. Kildishev et al. [physics/0609234] and V. M. Shalaev et al. [Opt. Lett. 30, 3345 (2005)] will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-649687