What Have We Learned About and From F_L(x,Q^2) at HERA?

Physics – High Energy Physics – High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Tex file, including modification of Harvmac, 17 pages plus 5 figures in .ps files

Scientific paper

10.1016/S0370-2693(97)01406-8

Recently the H1 collaboration has published a ``determination'' of the structure function F_L(x,Q^2) at low x. I address the question of how reliable this determination really is. I argue that it is in fact a consistency check of a given theoretical approach rather than a real determination of the value of F_L(x,Q^2), but potentially a very useful one. I compare the consistency of different approaches, and indeed find that a LO--in--\alpha_s calculation of structure functions is completely ruled out. I also find that the ``determined'' values of F_L(x,Q^2) are surprisingly stable under changes in theoretical approach but, when working consistently within a well-defined theoretical framework, the values of F_L(x,Q^2) implied are somewhat lower than previously quoted.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

What Have We Learned About and From F_L(x,Q^2) at HERA? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with What Have We Learned About and From F_L(x,Q^2) at HERA?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and What Have We Learned About and From F_L(x,Q^2) at HERA? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-633231

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.