Physics – Quantum Physics
Scientific paper
2006-02-08
Physics
Quantum Physics
8&1/2 pages revtex; v2: many corrections, clairifications & extentions, all small; v3: editorial scrub
Scientific paper
10.1134/S0030400X07090147
Quantum Mechanics lacks an intuitive interpretation, which is the cause of a generally formalistic approach to its use. This in turn has led to a certain insensitivity to the actual meaning of many words used in its description and interpretation. Herein, we analyze carefully the possible mathematical meanings of those terms used in analysis of EPR's contention, that Quantum Mechanics is incomplete, as well as Bell's work descendant therefrom. As a result, many inconsistencies and errors in contemporary discussions of nonlocality, as well as in Bell's Ansatz with respect to the laws of probability, are identified. Evading these errors precludes serious conflicts between Quantum Mechanics and both Special Relativity and Philosophy.
No associations
LandOfFree
Nonlocality, Bell's Ansatz and Probability does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Nonlocality, Bell's Ansatz and Probability, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Nonlocality, Bell's Ansatz and Probability will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-569013