Error probability analysis in quantum tomography: a tool for evaluating experiments

Physics – Quantum Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

14pages, 2 figures (an analysis of an example is added, and the proof of Lemma 2 is corrected)

Scientific paper

10.1103/PhysRevA.83.012105

We expand the scope of the statistical notion of error probability, i.e., how often large deviations are observed in an experiment, in order to make it directly applicable to quantum tomography. We verify that the error probability can decrease at most exponentially in the number of trials, derive the explicit rate that bounds this decrease, and show that a maximum likelihood estimator achieves this bound. We also show that the statistical notion of identifiability coincides with the tomographic notion of informational completeness. Our result implies that two quantum tomographic apparatuses that have the same risk function, (e.g. variance), can have different error probability, and we give an example in one qubit state tomography. Thus by combining these two approaches we can evaluate, in a reconstruction independent way, the performance of such experiments more discerningly.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Error probability analysis in quantum tomography: a tool for evaluating experiments does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Error probability analysis in quantum tomography: a tool for evaluating experiments, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Error probability analysis in quantum tomography: a tool for evaluating experiments will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-562804

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.