Interpreting the LSND anomaly: sterile neutrinos or CPT-violation or...?

Physics – High Energy Physics – High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

12 pages. Version 2: update about SNO. Version 3: addendum about KamLAND. Version 4: addendum at pages 11,12 discussing how mu

Scientific paper

10.1016/S0370-2693(02)02042-7

We first study how sterile neutrinos can fit the 5sigma bar-nu_mu --> bar-nu_e LSND anomaly: 2+2 solutions are strongly disfavoured by solar and atmospheric data, while 3+1 solutions can still give a poor fit (for a specific range of oscillation parameters, to be tested by MiniBooNE). If instead MiniBoone will find no nu_mu --> nu_e signal, we will have a hint for CPT violation. Already now, unlike sterile neutrinos, CPT-violating neutrino masses can nicely accomodate all safe and unsafe data. We study how much CPT must be conserved according to atmospheric and K2K data and list which CPT-violating signals could be discovered by forthcoming solar and long-baseline experiments.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Interpreting the LSND anomaly: sterile neutrinos or CPT-violation or...? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Interpreting the LSND anomaly: sterile neutrinos or CPT-violation or...?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Interpreting the LSND anomaly: sterile neutrinos or CPT-violation or...? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-553999

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.