Physics – Quantum Physics
Scientific paper
1999-05-20
Physics
Quantum Physics
30 pages, LaTeX, To be published in the December 1999 issue of The British Journal for Philosophy of Science
Scientific paper
Peter Lewis ([1997]) has recently argued that the wavefunction collapse theory of GRW (Ghirardi, Rimini, and Weber [1986]) can only solve the problem of wavefunction tails at the expense of predicting that arithmetic does not apply to ordinary macroscopic objects. More specifically, Lewis argues that the GRW theory must violate the enumeration principle: that `if marble 1 is in the box and marble 2 is in the box and so on through marble $n$, then all $n$ marbles are in the box' ([1997], p. 321). Ghirardi and Bassi ([1999]) have replied that it is meaningless to say that the enumeration principle is violated because the wavefunction Lewis uses to exhibit the violation cannot persist, according to the GRW theory, for more than a split second ([1999], p. 709). On the contrary, we argue that Lewis's argument survives Ghirardi and Bassi's criticism unscathed. We then go on to show that, while the enumeration principle can fail in the GRW theory, the theory itself guarantees that the principle can never be empirically falsified, leaving the applicability of arithmetical reasoning to both micro- and macroscopic objects intact.
Clifton Rob
Monton Bradley
No associations
LandOfFree
Losing Your Marbles in Wavefunction Collapse Theories does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Losing Your Marbles in Wavefunction Collapse Theories, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Losing Your Marbles in Wavefunction Collapse Theories will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-547517