Physics – Nuclear Physics – Nuclear Theory
Scientific paper
1997-01-17
Physics
Nuclear Physics
Nuclear Theory
3 pages, including 1 figure
Scientific paper
Shortcomings of a momentum-space treatment of strong absorption, as discussed in the previous Comment [nucl-th/9611025], are only of concern at low projectile energies, $\gamma$< 1.5. At intermediate and high energies, for which the quantum-mechanical equivalent-photon spectrum is intended, the quantum-mechanical cross sections are reduced relative to the semi-classical results whether one treats strong effects via a momentum-space or an impact-parameter (spatial) cut-off. At these energies the origin of the discrepancy between the predictions of full quantuym-mechanical and the semi-classical calulations cannot be traced to differences in the treatment of strong-interaction effects. Rather, they arise from quantum effects neglected in the semi-classical calculations.
Benesh C. J.
Friar J. L.
Hayes A. C.
No associations
LandOfFree
Reply to Baur's and Bertulani's Comment does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Reply to Baur's and Bertulani's Comment, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Reply to Baur's and Bertulani's Comment will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-542728