On the renormalization of the one-pion exchange potential and the consistency of Weinberg's power counting

Physics – Nuclear Physics – Nuclear Theory

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

15 pages, 12 figures

Scientific paper

Nogga, Timmermans and van Kolck recently argued that Weinberg's power counting in the few-nucleon sector is inconsistent and requires modifications. Their argument is based on the observed cutoff dependence of the nucleon-nucleon scattering amplitude calculated by solving the Lippmann-Schwinger equation with the regularized one-pion exchange potential and the cutoff Lambda varied in the range Lambda = 2...20 fm^(-1). In this paper we discuss the role the cutoff plays in the application of chiral effective field theory to the two-nucleon system and study carefully the cutoff-dependence of phase shifts and observables based on the one-pion exchange potential. We show that (i) there is no need to use the momentum-space cutoff larger than Lambda ~ 3 fm^(-1); (ii) the neutron-proton low-energy data show no evidence for an inconsistency of Weinberg's power counting.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

On the renormalization of the one-pion exchange potential and the consistency of Weinberg's power counting does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with On the renormalization of the one-pion exchange potential and the consistency of Weinberg's power counting, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and On the renormalization of the one-pion exchange potential and the consistency of Weinberg's power counting will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-537716

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.