Anthropic Estimates of the Charge and Mass of the Proton

Physics – High Energy Physics – High Energy Physics - Theory

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

12 pages, LaTeX

Scientific paper

10.1016/j.physletb.2009.04.021

By combining a renormalization group argument relating the charge e and mass m of the proton by e^2 ln m ~ 0.1 pi (in Planck units) with the Carter-Carr-Rees anthropic argument that gives an independent approximate relation m ~ e^20 between these two constants, both can be crudely estimated. These equations have the factor of 0.1 pi and the exponent of 20 which depend upon known discrete parameters (e.g., the number of generations of quarks and leptons, and the number of spatial dimensions), but they contain NO continuous observed parameters. Their solution gives the charge of the proton correct to within about 8%, though the mass estimate is off by a factor of about 1000 (16% error on a logarithmic scale). When one adds a fudge factor of 10 previously given by Carr and Rees, the agreement for the charge is within about 2%, and the mass is off by a factor of about 3 (2.4% error on a logarithmic scale). If this 10 were replaced by 15, the charge agrees within 1.1% and the mass itself agrees within 0.7%.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Anthropic Estimates of the Charge and Mass of the Proton does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Anthropic Estimates of the Charge and Mass of the Proton, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Anthropic Estimates of the Charge and Mass of the Proton will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-53718

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.