Physics – General Physics
Scientific paper
2009-05-29
Physics
General Physics
This version, v3, contains the rigorous mathematical presentation of the model, PCSFT, prequantum classical statistical field
Scientific paper
One of the crucial differences between mathematical models of classical and quantum mechanics is the use of the tensor product of the state spaces of subsystems as the state space of the corresponding composite system. (To describe an ensemble of classical composite systems one uses random variables taking values in the Cartesian product of the state spaces of subsystems.) We show that, nevertheless, it is possible to establish a natural correspondence between the classical and quantum probabilistic descriptions of composite systems. Quantum averages for composite systems (including entangled) can be represented as averages with respect to classical random fields. It is essentially what Albert Einstein was dreamed of. Quantum mechanics is represented as classical statistical mechanics with infinite-dimensional phase space. While the mathematical construction is completely rigorous, its physical interpretation is a complicated problem (which will not be discussed in this paper).
No associations
LandOfFree
Demystification of quantum entanglement does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Demystification of quantum entanglement, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Demystification of quantum entanglement will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-526837