Can We Distinguish Between the Grand Canonical and the Canonical Ensemble in a BEC Experiment?

Physics – Atomic Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

8 pages, 2 figures, revision fixes typo in equation 8

Scientific paper

10.1103/PhysRevA.55.3254

It is well known that at the thermodynamic limit there are no observable differences in the results obtained by grand canonical and canonical descriptions of a many-body system. In the present paper, we test the validity of this statement for finite systems using as an example an ensemble of bosons trapped in a 1D harmonic potential well. We have found an analytical formula for the canonical partition function and shown that, for 100 trapped atoms, the discrepancy between the grand canonical and canonical predictions for the condensate fraction reaches 10% in the vicinity of the Bose-Einstein threshold. This discrepancy decreases only logarithmically as the number of atoms increases. Furthermore we investigate numerically the case of a 3D "cigar-shape" trap in the range of parameters corresponding to current BEC experiments.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Can We Distinguish Between the Grand Canonical and the Canonical Ensemble in a BEC Experiment? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Can We Distinguish Between the Grand Canonical and the Canonical Ensemble in a BEC Experiment?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Can We Distinguish Between the Grand Canonical and the Canonical Ensemble in a BEC Experiment? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-525979

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.