Logical Inconsistencies in Proofs of the Theorem of Bell

Physics – Quantum Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

8 pages

Scientific paper

We discuss a class of proofs of Bell-type inequalities that are based on tables of potential outcomes. These proofs state in essence: if one can only imagine (or write down in a table) the potential outcome of a hidden parameter model for EPR experiments then a contradiction to experiment and quantum mechanics follows. We show that these proofs do not contain hidden variables that relate to time or, if they do, lead to logical contradictions that render them invalid.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Logical Inconsistencies in Proofs of the Theorem of Bell does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Logical Inconsistencies in Proofs of the Theorem of Bell, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Logical Inconsistencies in Proofs of the Theorem of Bell will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-522495

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.