Integrating Out Astrophysical Uncertainties

Physics – High Energy Physics – High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

25 pages, 7 figures; v2 replaced with published version

Scientific paper

10.1103/PhysRevD.83.103514

Underground searches for dark matter involve a complicated interplay of particle physics, nuclear physics, atomic physics and astrophysics. We attempt to remove the uncertainties associated with astrophysics by developing the means to map the observed signal in one experiment directly into a predicted rate at another. We argue that it is possible to make experimental comparisons that are completely free of astrophysical uncertainties by focusing on {\em integral} quantities, such as $g(v_{min})=\int_{v_{min}} dv\, f(v)/v $ and $\int_{v_{thresh}} dv\, v g(v)$. Direct comparisons are possible when the $v_{min}$ space probed by different experiments overlap. As examples, we consider the possible dark matter signals at CoGeNT, DAMA and CRESST-Oxygen. We find that expected rate from CoGeNT in the XENON10 experiment is higher than observed, unless scintillation light output is low. Moreover, we determine that S2-only analyses are constraining, unless the charge yield $Q_y< 2.4 {\, \rm electrons/keV}$. For DAMA to be consistent with XENON10, we find for $q_{Na}=0.3$ that the modulation rate must be extremely high ($\gsim 70%$ for $m_\chi = 7\, \gev$), while for higher quenching factors, it makes an explicit prediction (0.8 - 0.9 cpd/kg) for the modulation to be observed at CoGeNT. Finally, we find CDMS-Si, even with a 10 keV threshold, as well as XENON10, even with low scintillation, would have seen significant rates if the excess events at CRESST arise from elastic WIMP scattering, making it very unlikely to be the explanation of this anomaly.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Integrating Out Astrophysical Uncertainties does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Integrating Out Astrophysical Uncertainties, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Integrating Out Astrophysical Uncertainties will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-492072

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.