Physics – General Physics
Scientific paper
2007-09-05
Physics
General Physics
Scientific paper
Within the past fifteen years the use of the concept of "relativistic mass" has been on the decline and has been replaced by the concept of "proper mass" (aka "rest mass") - ?simply referred to as "mass" and labeled "m" by its proponents. This decline in usage appears to be due to arguments presented in several journal articles over the last thirty-five years, as well as to standard practices in the field of particle physics. The aforementioned debate consists of arguments as to how the term "mass" should be defined to maximize logic as well as to be less confusing to the layman and people just starting to learn relativity. Lacking in the debate is a clear definition of all types of mass and all its usages in a wide variety of cases. The purpose in this article is to bring a unifying perspective to the subject. In doing so I will explore those things omitted from previous articles on this subject including the importance of point particles vs. extended objects; open vs. closed systems and gravitational mass. Although I argue for the usage of relativistic mass I do "not" argue that proper mass is not an important tool in relativistic dynamics.
No associations
LandOfFree
On the concept of relativistic mass does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with On the concept of relativistic mass, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and On the concept of relativistic mass will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-470836