Physics – Quantum Physics
Scientific paper
2000-12-01
Physics
Quantum Physics
15 pages with 4 figures, submitted to Phys. Rev. A. Minor corrections made, conclusions unchanged
Scientific paper
10.1103/PhysRevA.64.022321
Fidelity F{classical} = 1/2 has been established as setting the boundary between classical and quantum domains in the teleportation of coherent states of the electromagnetic field (S. L. Braunstein, C. A. Fuchs, and H. J. Kimble, J. Mod. Opt. 47, 267 (2000)). Two recent papers by P. Grangier and F. Grosshans (quant-ph/0009079 and quant-ph/0010107) introduce alternate criteria for setting this boundary and as a result claim that the appropriate boundary should be F = 2/3. Although larger fidelities would lead to enhanced teleportation capabilities, we show that the new conditions of Grangier and Grosshans are largely unrelated to the questions of entanglement and Bell-inequality violations that they take to be their primary concern. With regard to the quantum-classical boundary, we demonstrate that fidelity F{classical} = 1/2 remains the appropriate point of demarcation. The claims of Grangier and Grosshans to the contrary are simply wrong, as we show by an analysis of the conditions for nonseparability (that complements our earlier treatment) and by explicit examples of Bell-inequality violations.
Braunstein Samuel L.
Fuchs Christopher A.
Kimble Jeff H.
Loock Peter van
No associations
LandOfFree
Quantum versus Classical Domains for Teleportation with Continuous Variables does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Quantum versus Classical Domains for Teleportation with Continuous Variables, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Quantum versus Classical Domains for Teleportation with Continuous Variables will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-464041